One of my daughters arguing her unbelief told me: therefore, I am humble, which is true and false. True in the sense that in the absence of religious feeling one has more merit in practicing the gospel and false in the sense that a general tendency to sufficiency is forgotten.

Our thesis is faith in the gentle humility of the Divine nature on which the rest is dependent.

11/07/2021

The short gospels confirmed by the Ecumenical Church were written by memory of 4 witnesses of the life of Jesus-Christ. Which must be read to know him humanly.  

First Matthew, the tax collector Romans, frowned upon by the Jews and converted by Christ.

Then Luke, cultivated doctor and witness more especially of his mother’s life.

After, Mark to the faith that would have been fragile.

Finally John, in the movement of the high priests, favorite apostle. They overlap enough and we can easily make a single synoptic gospel. In his mission which lasted three years. Christ never ceased to surround himself with a small number of disciples who in reality did not understand his teaching made of the entanglement by his human personality as an unexpected Jewish prophet. And an expected universal messiah. The confusion remains.

12/07/2021 _20/12/2020

Our universal thesis decked out in art and intuitive science gives the world the lifting of the mystery of a deep nature, through the unprecedented agony of Jesus-Christ man and messiah. The reservations to our thesis that can be made are as follows:

First presents itself for ecumenical Christianity of which the author is part

1/ the patent indignity of its author.
2/ the love final point considered as such.
3/ the sign of the cross which comes however after the agony.

Then for the other religions  

1/ the insufficiency of the author.
2/ their original way final point.
3/ the gospel held in hand by Christian indignity.

Finally for non-religions 

1/ the author’s belief
2/ their absence of religious feeling
3/ the obscurities of the gospels. But the Truth is always looking for itself.

13/07/2021

Christianity

1/ the author’s indignity is obvious. Nothing in his life justifies being able to be trusted. He himself plunged into doubt about this can only cling to the infinite faithfulness of God, principle of life of the universes on which we all depend.  

2/ Love as final point forms a major obstacle. Considered by Israel as the divine deep nature and brought to its perfection for Christians. Love remains for us the goal but without final point leading all spiritual research to its first humble nature. To justify further we can ask if we would like a God of pride or violence and we then understand why the messianic life finally announces divine humility before.  

3/ the cross, eminently distinctive sign of the Christian, the church must renounce to impose it for the pre-eminent anguish of Gethsemane which has:

in addition to the sign, a bloody sweating due to the agony of the heart of universal messiah whose infinite durability of the whole world depends.

Thus, the cross is for the Christian the practical concretization of the teaching of his master.  

The fact remains that the church giving Jesus to the world remains responsible for the gospel.

Other religions

1/ without little religious training other than mystical research through the succinct history of all religions and philosophies. My place is only in faith. I am only a very small disciple of Christ who has shown messianism through his keen passion.

2/ Here we must privilege the religions that came as ours from Abraham, because the latter have the recognized commonality of personalization of a Unique God who by his very transcendence escapes our appreciations. How is it that a simple man, Jesus-Christ, can be certain of a perfect fusion of his teaching and his life with the Divine nature? Christians add the mysterious proofs to his direct disciples of his resurrection three days after his death and that for 40 days. In fact, we must consider the intense desire of this human heart for God. He is not the first prophet in this case but we can see how far he has given proof of this. By his atrocious premonition of a humiliating ordeal, ruining all his holiest projects, even though Muslim authorities consider not without reason that he himself would not have suffered it, he surrendered himself perfectly to the will of the Most High. Now we can recognize that human nature has the contrary tendency carried to the highest point.   
The present adherence to the messiah through the gospel in no way harms other religious data on the condition, as for all, not being locked into a narrow conception of things.  

3/ It remains that the gospel is necessary to know Jesus and that the Christian religion, divided moreover into several units, tends to appropriate it as an institution itself. The authority of the regularly elected Pope remains a guarantee for the authenticity of the latter.

Non religion

1/ Who with religious feeling can make himself understood with the infidel? This is the uncertain faith advancing faithful against everything (including Chinese compunction). Indeed, faith in life with the goals of consciousness remains an impregnable field.  

2/ We can notice whatever the cause that there are two ways of looking at it. The lack of religious life comes or from the refusal to seek the truth and comes up against our opposition whose very deep reasons we must seek, or from the natural coming from inability to transcendence.  

3/ Accepting the humble annihilation of the principle of revivable life in another universe such as the gospel announces it, is not self-evident. This is why it is necessary to suffer the opacities in the patient hope, that they will one day be cleared up and to admit that it is first of all an instruction which does not depend on time strictly speaking and which submits to the personality of each one.  

**In addition, Catholic in a context of unity of religions including in particular Christians, Jews, Muslims, and non-religion, it may seem difficult to talk of the one who must make the union of all, the Virgin Mary, but I am French and carried by her national popularity whose number of places of devotion is not counted. 

Leaving aside her virginity, in the face of ostracism and any interpretations whatsoever of male tradition of all times, she is considered to be conceived of ordinary parents without the slightest trace of congenital pride. 

This is how the Virgin Mary, an exceptional, unique woman, remains a virgin of our vicious tendency that in good faith we cannot fail to recognize. 

Therefore, she is so how much worthy to remain the reigning and loving mother, for our safeguarding of the one who until his agony merging with the Divine nature will not hesitate to act humbly.  

It should also be remembered that unity is also about morally ruled science.

Read the works and visit FODE